🔗 Share this article

Among the most recognizable pictures from modern history shows a nude girl, her arms extended, her expression twisted in pain, her flesh scorched and peeling. She can be seen fleeing toward the camera as escaping a bombing during South Vietnam. Nearby, other children are fleeing out of the destroyed hamlet in the region, amid a background of dark smoke along with troops.

This International Influence of a Powerful Picture

Just after the publication in June 1972, this picture—officially named "Napalm Girl"—evolved into a traditional sensation. Viewed and analyzed by countless people, it's generally credited for motivating public opinion against the American involvement in Southeast Asia. An influential critic afterwards commented how this horrifically unforgettable image featuring the young Kim Phúc suffering possibly had a greater impact to heighten global outrage toward the conflict than a hundred hours of broadcast violence. An esteemed British photojournalist who documented the fighting called it the single best photograph from the so-called the televised conflict. One more veteran photojournalist declared how the photograph is quite simply, one of the most important images in history, specifically of the Vietnam war.

The Decades-Long Attribution Followed by a Modern Claim

For over five decades, the photograph was attributed to Nick Út, a then-21-year-old South Vietnamese photojournalist on assignment for an international outlet in Saigon. Yet a disputed recent documentary released by a streaming service argues that the famous picture—long considered as the peak of combat photography—may have been taken by a different man present that day during the attack.

As claimed by the documentary, the iconic image may have been photographed by an independent photographer, who offered the images to the AP. The claim, and its subsequent investigation, stems from an individual called an ex-staffer, who alleges how the dominant editor directed the staff to change the photo's byline from the freelancer to Nick Út, the only agency photographer present during the incident.

The Investigation for the Truth

The former editor, now in his 80s, emailed one of the journalists in 2022, seeking support to locate the uncredited cameraman. He stated how, if he could be found, he hoped to give an acknowledgment. The investigator thought of the independent photographers he worked with—comparing them to the stringers of today, just as local photographers at the time, are often overlooked. Their contributions is commonly challenged, and they work amid more challenging circumstances. They are not insured, no retirement plans, little backing, they frequently lack good equipment, and they are highly exposed as they capture images in familiar settings.

The journalist wondered: Imagine the experience to be the person who made this iconic picture, should it be true that Nick Út didn’t take it?” From a photographic perspective, he speculated, it would be deeply distressing. As an observer of war photography, particularly the highly regarded combat images of Vietnam, it would be reputation-threatening, possibly reputation-threatening. The respected heritage of "Napalm Girl" in the community meant that the director who had family emigrated at the time was reluctant to engage with the project. He said, “I didn’t want to challenge the accepted account that credited Nick the image. And I didn’t want to disturb the existing situation of a community that consistently respected this achievement.”

This Search Unfolds

But both the filmmaker and the creator felt: it was important raising the issue. When reporters must hold everybody else accountable,” noted the journalist, it is essential that we be able to pose challenging queries about our own field.”

The film follows the investigators as they pursue their own investigation, from discussions with witnesses, to call-outs in present-day Saigon, to reviewing records from related materials taken that day. Their work lead to an identity: Nguyễn Thành Nghệ, working for a television outlet during the attack who also worked as a stringer to foreign agencies on a freelance basis. According to the documentary, a moved the claimant, now also in his 80s based in the United States, attests that he provided the photograph to the news organization for a small fee and a print, yet remained troubled by the lack of credit over many years.

The Response Followed by Further Analysis

Nghệ appears in the film, thoughtful and thoughtful, however, his claim turned out to be controversial within the world of photojournalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to