🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, protest has ceased to be a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that those in power grant or deny as they see fit. This constitutes the underlying meaning of new regulations that the ruling administration is advancing, which would determine when and where protests can occur, with potential imprisonment for those who disobey these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Earlier governments had already weakened this essential right: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which international human rights organizations had condemned as "serious and unjustified limitations" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these incremental assaults on liberty have effectively eliminated the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Tragedy to Justify Suppression

The most recent limitations are being justified by citing last week's terrible antisemitic assault on a Manchester Islamic center. There should be universal agreement that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, using this atrocity as a pretext to stifle dissent is not only unrelated to that responsibility but perverts it.

"When you can't set boundaries at mass killing, you probably cannot establish limits at democratic principles," commented a prominent American author, a statement that rings true for the current government.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and direct action against racial discrimination and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these historical demonstrators were branded as extremists in their era, even while they were advocating the freedoms of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In today's complex situation, here's what's truly happening: Israel – a sovereign nation – is committing what United Nations investigations have described as systematic destruction. Its military actions have prompted the International Criminal Court to issue legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

Western public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens believe Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would support a total prohibition on arms sales to the state, and back the arrest of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having largely lost the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to attempt to silence a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be involved in this effort. Ministers have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to continue.

People who are protesting against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive crackdown on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish identity with the policies of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also harmful. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly challenged for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a point where law enforcement can propose that protests opposing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "accidentally or intentionally" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have stated that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made organizations "complicit" in alleged abuse faced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of daily atrocities that have claimed tens of thousands of lives. British politicians and news organizations have barely concealed the limited value they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of discrimination in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a dangerous threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused activist collective. Thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, primarily for holding signs opposing genocide and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; among them a former clergyman and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader implied that some were "connected to" other nations, while the sitting leader described such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to suppress opposition. What might a Reform government do with this restrictive framework? Our ancestors fought, endured hardship and died to secure our liberties. We may ultimately regret how casually we allowed them to be eroded.